Costco Charmin Ultra Soft

Cold War 1975-2010 Spanish appreciation of silence

I do not like The Intermediate , I do not like his sense of humor forced. But yesterday I made an exception. I saw a few minutes of the re-issuance of 01:30. video spoke of impunity for the crimes of the Franco and subtitles that had added to its broadcast the program "Water Cat" Intereconomía chain .

That was a sort of Cold War the English. Restlessness, quarrels , anger, two sides clearly distinguished and knives flying.

On one side was Wyo ming, disqualifying s easy jokes dual intent of the subtitles, which read something like that there are no sides to be able to forgive and that both victims were l ADOS. And yet, something seen people preserving LLE reason. Recall that during the last years of the Republic, the reprisals were widespread: the left burned churches and killed priests Debid anticlericalism or uncontrolled (something beyond my comprehension, as being deeply atheistic beliefs advocate tolerance).

So far, so true, to say nothing of the war and shot all this meant. But in the end, war and s legal instrument, and killing it is contemplated, as indeed is the fast and effective extermination what is intended otherwise, neither is taken far too much discomfort part of a fair trial.

But then, after the war, the Nationalists were able to find their families, while Republicans and other opponents were endless repression and of course, had forgotten to force their missing if you do not want to share whereabouts. Franco fell to the English to their status of animals, denying all rights and human liberty, and thousands of people lost track of their brothers, fathers and sons. Conclusion: dictatorships are an attack on individual welfare. And wars are sad, very sad.

But 60 years have passed and incomplete pre nsiblemente still two sides, and either one or the other side to close in recon Ocero past crimes. The subject can not stay on earth who could meet their f amiliares, or who may be on today the ashes in a jug on the mantelpiece. I guess that is not comparable what happened during 48 years of dictatorship with the Second Republic , but if the supports progressive social change verdadermante should take the first step, stop campaigning to raise blisters and admit that unjust attack against the Church, because that will differ from the Franco proud and public opinion put pressure on the other side, demanding a real confession of what happened. I think the left should take the lead, because the right is a lost cause: it remains steeped in its traditions and archaic constumbres too stuck in the nostalgia of the old English empire to think about the years ahead.

Intereconomía , which has proven to be very unprofessional (especially with the specimen Eduardo Garcia Serrano, often used insults as the only possible arguments) and ridiculously preclude any ideological opening in a society increasingly liberal and rationalist, has a point: must know how to forgive, but not making a fresh start tomorrow, no. Before, as in any discussion of couples, we must recognize own faults that have led to the altercation , be the first to give not the most in fault, but the less proud and more interesting in that reconciliation.

I think the only way you will reach the consensus and the Law of Historical Memory.

Anyway there is something I do not understand why they insist on using famous faces to feature this kind of campaign? Is that famosillos mouth is more important?